Skip to main content
Advanced Search

Filters: Tags: integrity (X)

398 results (38ms)   

Filters
View Results as: JSON ATOM CSV
thumbnail
Freshwater Marsh Ecosystem Integrity - Blueprint 2.0 This layer is part of an older version of the Blueprint. This data represents the Blueprint 2.0 ecosystem integrity scores for the freshwater marsh ecosystem within the South Atlantic LCC geography. To read more about the indicators, please visit the indicator page. Input Data and Mapping Steps Indicators (200 m resolution) were spatially modeled, tested, reviewed, and used as inputs to derive high integrity areas. Please see the indicator folder in the Blueprint 2.0 data gallery for more information about indicator spatial data. The integrity scores for this system are based on indicators within the freshwater marsh and landscapes ecosystem. These indicators...
thumbnail
The Western Governors’ Association (WGA) sponsored an assessment of crucial habitats which will be used for the evaluation of landscape-scale energy, land use, and transportation projects throughout the western United States. The main product of the WGA’s assessment is an easily accessible online system of maps displaying crucial habitats and corridors known as the Crucial Habitat Assessment Tool (CHAT; http://www.westgovchat.org/).Crucial habitats were based on factors such as species of concern, species of economic and recreational importance, special ecological systems and habitat types, habitat corridors, native species richness, and ecological integrity (i.e., unfragmented habitats). All of these factors are...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
This layer represents the scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for SNK 2010 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales.
thumbnail
This layer represents the scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for SNK 2010 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales.
thumbnail
This layer represents the scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for SNK 2010 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales.
thumbnail
This layer represents the scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for SNK 2010 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales.
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near-future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near-future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near-future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
This layer represents the near-future scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for projected 2025 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales. Please see "cmbrCE and indicators.xlsx" for a complete list of which measures were applied to individual CEs for current...
thumbnail
This layer represents the near-future scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for projected 2025 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales. Please see "cmbrCE and indicators.xlsx" for a complete list of which measures were applied to individual CEs for current...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and Invasive Annual Plant Species. The annual grass index represents a summary score for a CE based upon the amount of the CE itersecting the annual grass model. The summary score is a weighted mean using the following formula. ((C0*0.5+C1*0.05+C2*0.05+C3+0.1+C4*0.1+C5*0.15)/Total Count)/0.5 *where C is the cell count by category. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation...
thumbnail
This layer represents the near-future scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for projected 2025 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales. Please see "cmbrCE and indicators.xlsx" for a complete list of which measures were applied to individual CEs for current...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at...
thumbnail
This layer represents the scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for SNK 2010 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales.
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near-future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at...


map background search result map search result map Incorporating ecological integrity into the Western Governors’ assessment of aquatic crucial habitats in Washington and Oregon OUTDATED Freshwater Marsh: Ecosystem Integrity - South Atlantic Blueprint 2.0 BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Desert Tortoise (Sonoran Population) BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Carbonate (Limestone/Dolomite) alpine BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Near-Term: Great Basin Xeric Mixed Sagebrush Shrubland BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Brewer's Sparrow (migratory) BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Near-Term: North American Warm Desert Pavement BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Invasive Annual Plant Species - Gypsum Soils BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Near-Term: Sonora-Mojave Semi-Desert Chaparral BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Mule Deer (Year-Round) BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Gila Monster BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 714068 Cackling Goose BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 9901 Arctic Mesic Tundra BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 9358 Arctic Dwarf Shrub-Sphagnum Peatland BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 9376 Boreal Black Spruce Dwarf Tree Peatland BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 5328 Arctic Mesic Alder BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Carbonate (Limestone/Dolomite) alpine BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition - Columbian Sharp-tailed Grouse BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition - Clay Soils BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition - Sage Sparrow BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Desert Tortoise (Sonoran Population) BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Gila Monster BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Brewer's Sparrow (migratory) BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Invasive Annual Plant Species - Gypsum Soils BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition - Columbian Sharp-tailed Grouse BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Near-Term: Sonora-Mojave Semi-Desert Chaparral BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Near-Term: Great Basin Xeric Mixed Sagebrush Shrubland BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Near-Term: North American Warm Desert Pavement BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 9376 Boreal Black Spruce Dwarf Tree Peatland BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Carbonate (Limestone/Dolomite) alpine BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Carbonate (Limestone/Dolomite) alpine BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 9358 Arctic Dwarf Shrub-Sphagnum Peatland BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 714068 Cackling Goose BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition - Sage Sparrow BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 9901 Arctic Mesic Tundra BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 5328 Arctic Mesic Alder BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition - Clay Soils BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Mule Deer (Year-Round) OUTDATED Freshwater Marsh: Ecosystem Integrity - South Atlantic Blueprint 2.0 Incorporating ecological integrity into the Western Governors’ assessment of aquatic crucial habitats in Washington and Oregon