Skip to main content
Advanced Search

Filters: Tags: hadley3 gcm (X)

8 results (220ms)   

View Results as: JSON ATOM CSV
thumbnail
This dataset depicts dominant species groups in Minnesota (USA) at year 0 (1995) from a single model run of LANDIS-II. The simulation assumed Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) A2 emissions (moderate) and used the Hadley 3 global circulation model. Restoration harvest rates and intensities were simulated. Restoration harvesting was spatially allocated following ecological land units (rather than ownership) and harvest frequency, severity, and size distributions were based on historic wind and fire regimes. The projected dominant species were listed as follows: 1) Spruce and Fir; 2) Northern Hardwoods: Sugar Maple; 3) Northern Hardwoods: Red Maple; 4) Aspen and Birch; 5) White, Red, and Jack Pine; 6)...
thumbnail
This dataset depicts dominant species groups in Minnesota (USA) at year 0 (1995) from a single model run of LANDIS-II. The simulation assumed Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) B2 emissions (moderate) and used the Hadley 3 global circulation model. Restoration harvest rates and intensities were simulated. Restoration harvesting was spatially allocated following ecological land units (rather than ownership) and harvest frequency, severity, and size distributions were based on historic wind and fire regimes. The projected dominant species were listed as follows: 1) Spruce and Fir; 2) Northern Hardwoods: Sugar Maple; 3) Northern Hardwoods: Red Maple; 4) Aspen and Birch; 5) White, Red, and Jack Pine; 6)...
thumbnail
This dataset depicts dominant species groups in Minnesota (USA) at year 150 (2145) from a single model run of LANDIS-II. The simulation assumed IPCC A2 emissions (moderate) and used the Hadley 3 global circulation model. Contemporary harvest rates and intensities were simulated. Contemporary harvesting was spatially allocated following ecological land units (rather than ownership) and harvest frequency, severity, and size distributions were based on historic wind and fire regimes. The projected dominant species were listed as follows: 1) Spruce and Fir; 2) Northern Hardwoods: Sugar Maple; 3) Northern Hardwoods: Red Maple; 4) Aspen and Birch; 5) White, Red, and Jack Pine; 6) Other species.
thumbnail
This dataset depicts dominant species groups in Minnesota (USA) at year 150 (2145) from a single model run of LANDIS-II. The simulation assumed IPCC B2 emissions (moderate) and used the Hadley 3 global circulation model. Contemporary harvest rates and intensities were simulated. Contemporary harvesting was spatially allocated following ecological land units (rather than ownership) and harvest frequency, severity, and size distributions were based on historic wind and fire regimes. The projected dominant species were listed as follows: 1) Spruce and Fir; 2) Northern Hardwoods: Sugar Maple; 3) Northern Hardwoods: Red Maple; 4) Aspen and Birch; 5) White, Red, and Jack Pine; 6) Other species.
thumbnail
This dataset depicts dominant species groups in Minnesota (USA) at year 0 (1995) from a single model run of LANDIS-II. The simulation assumed IPCC B2 emissions (moderate) and used the Hadley 3 global circulation model. Contemporary harvest rates and intensities were simulated. Contemporary harvesting was spatially allocated following ecological land units (rather than ownership) and harvest frequency, severity, and size distributions were based on historic wind and fire regimes. The projected dominant species were listed as follows: 1) Spruce and Fir; 2) Northern Hardwoods: Sugar Maple; 3) Northern Hardwoods: Red Maple; 4) Aspen and Birch; 5) White, Red, and Jack Pine; 6) Other species.
thumbnail
This dataset depicts dominant species groups in Minnesota (USA) at year 0 (1995) from a single model run of LANDIS-II. The simulation assumed IPCC A2 emissions (moderate) and used the Hadley 3 global circulation model. Contemporary harvest rates and intensities were simulated. Contemporary harvesting was spatially allocated following ecological land units (rather than ownership) and harvest frequency, severity, and size distributions were based on historic wind and fire regimes. The projected dominant species were listed as follows: 1) Spruce and Fir; 2) Northern Hardwoods: Sugar Maple; 3) Northern Hardwoods: Red Maple; 4) Aspen and Birch; 5) White, Red, and Jack Pine; 6) Other species.
thumbnail
This dataset depicts dominant species groups in Minnesota (USA) at year 150 (2145) from a single model run of LANDIS-II. The simulation assumed IPCC A2 emissions (moderate) and used the Hadley 3 global circulation model. Restoration harvest rates and intensities were simulated. Restoration harvesting was spatially allocated following ecological land units (rather than ownership) and harvest frequency, severity, and size distributions were based on historic wind and fire regimes. The projected dominant species were listed as follows: 1) Spruce and Fir; 2) Northern Hardwoods: Sugar Maple; 3) Northern Hardwoods: Red Maple; 4) Aspen and Birch; 5) White, Red, and Jack Pine; 6) Other species.
thumbnail
This dataset depicts dominant species groups in Minnesota (USA) at year 150 (2145) from a single model run of LANDIS-II. The simulation assumed Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) A2 emissions (moderate) and used the Hadley 3 global circulation model. Restoration harvest rates and intensities were simulated. Restoration harvesting was spatially allocated following ecological land units (rather than ownership) and harvest frequency, severity, and size distributions were based on historic wind and fire regimes. The projected dominant species were listed as follows: 1) Spruce and Fir; 2) Northern Hardwoods: Sugar Maple; 3) Northern Hardwoods: Red Maple; 4) Aspen and Birch; 5) White, Red, and Jack Pine;...


    map background search result map search result map Minnesota (USA) Climate Change Project: Dominant species at Year 150 (2145), assuming emissions scenario B2, Hadley 3 GCM, contemporary harvest rates and intensity Minnesota (USA) Climate Change Project: Dominant species at Year 0 (1995), assuming emissions scenario B2, Hadley3 GCM, contemporary harvest rates and intensity Minnesota (USA) Climate Change Project: Dominant species at Year 0 (1995), assuming emissions scenario A2, Hadley3 GCM, contemporary harvest rates and intensity Minnesota (USA) Climate Change Project: Dominant species at Year 150 (2145), assuming emissions scenario A2, Hadley3 GCM, contemporary harvest rates and intensity Minnesota (USA) Climate Change Project: Dominant species at Year 150 (2145), assuming emissions scenario B2, Hadley3 GCM, restoration harvest rates and intensity Minnesota (USA) Climate Change Project: Dominant species at Year 0 (1995), assuming emissions scenario B2, Hadley3 GCM, restoration harvest rates and intensity Minnesota (USA) Climate Change Project: Dominant species at Year 150 (2145), assuming emissions scenario A2, Hadley3 GCM, restoration harvest rates and intensity Minnesota (USA) Climate Change Project: Dominant species at Year 0 (1995), assuming emissions scenario A2, Hadley3 GCM, restoration harvest rates and intensity Minnesota (USA) Climate Change Project: Dominant species at Year 150 (2145), assuming emissions scenario B2, Hadley3 GCM, restoration harvest rates and intensity Minnesota (USA) Climate Change Project: Dominant species at Year 0 (1995), assuming emissions scenario B2, Hadley3 GCM, restoration harvest rates and intensity Minnesota (USA) Climate Change Project: Dominant species at Year 150 (2145), assuming emissions scenario A2, Hadley3 GCM, restoration harvest rates and intensity Minnesota (USA) Climate Change Project: Dominant species at Year 0 (1995), assuming emissions scenario A2, Hadley3 GCM, restoration harvest rates and intensity Minnesota (USA) Climate Change Project: Dominant species at Year 150 (2145), assuming emissions scenario B2, Hadley 3 GCM, contemporary harvest rates and intensity Minnesota (USA) Climate Change Project: Dominant species at Year 0 (1995), assuming emissions scenario B2, Hadley3 GCM, contemporary harvest rates and intensity Minnesota (USA) Climate Change Project: Dominant species at Year 0 (1995), assuming emissions scenario A2, Hadley3 GCM, contemporary harvest rates and intensity Minnesota (USA) Climate Change Project: Dominant species at Year 150 (2145), assuming emissions scenario A2, Hadley3 GCM, contemporary harvest rates and intensity