Filters
Date Range
Contacts
Tag Schemes
|
Description: This is the scenario summed solution from the low goals run. This is one of the four scenarios that were combined to form the basis of the regional conservation design. Regional Conservation Design generated by the Southern Sierra Partnership as part of the report ("Framework"): “ Framework for Cooperative Conservation and Climate Adaptation for the Southern Sierra Nevada and Tehachapi Mountains”. See Framework (Section 5.2, Table 7) for low and high goals for vegetation systems, rare plant substrate, etc.
Compilation of USFS-CDF Calveg vegetation type mapping and Land Cover Mapping and Monitoring program Multi-source land cover layer. The Calveg data was given precedence when the two layers were merged; the multi-source data was used to fill in a few araes where Calveg was not completed. The Calveg data were downloaded in 2007 and may not be the most recent for some tiles.
This is the table used to represent the suitability or cost layer to be used in Marxan. Suitability is comprised of three weighted threats: Roads were weighted 2x, intensive agriculture 1x and housing density 5x. The local road & highway weighting was done before being combined with agriculture and housing density.
This is the scenario summed solution from the high goals run. This is one of the four scenarios that were combined to form the basis of the regional conservation design. Regional Conservation Design generated by the Southern Sierra Partnership as part of the report ("Framework"): “ Framework for Cooperative Conservation and Climate Adaptation for the Southern Sierra Nevada and Tehachapi Mountains”. See Framework (Section 5.2, Table 7) for low and high goals set for vegetation systems, rare plant substrate, etc.
Planning area boundaries for Southern Sierra and Tehachapi Conservation Action Plans (project-level CAPs). Abridged versions of the two CAPs are presented in the Framework’s Appendix.
This is the scenario summed solution from the high goals run that included climate adaptation factors. This is one of the four scenarios that were combined to form the basis of the regional conservation design. Regional Conservation Design generated by the Southern Sierra Partnership as part of the report ("Framework"): “Framework for Cooperative Conservation and Climate Adaptation for the Southern Sierra Nevada and Tehachapi Mountains”. See section 5.0 of Framework for goals and methods.
Regional Conservation Design generated by the Southern Sierra Partnership as part of the report ("Framework"): “ Framework for Cooperative Conservation and Climate Adaptation for the Southern Sierra Nevada and Tehachapi Mountains”. It is a synthesis of the four scenarios. See section 5.0 of Framework for goals and methods. The Regional Conservation Design is the SSP’s spatial vision for conservation that takes into account the current distribution of biodiversity and threats as well as the projected effects of climate change in the region. The SSP’s Regional Conservation Design identifies a network of core areas and connections between them that support high biodiversity and valuable ecosystem services. ...
Regional Conservation Design generated by the Southern Sierra Partnership as part of the report ("Plan"): "Climate-adapted Conservation Plan for the Southern Sierra Nevada and Tehachapi Mountains".
Planning area boundary for the SSP regional assessment. The assessment area is 7,033,942 acres. The region comprises portions of four ecoregions (Sierra Nevada, Great Central Valley, South Coast and Mojave Desert) and five geomorphic provinces (Sierra Nevada, Great Central Valley Coastal Ranges, Transverse Ranges, and Mojave Desert).
This is the scenario summed solution from the low goals run that incorporated climate adaptation factors. This is one of the four scenarios that were combined to form the basis of the regional conservation design. Regional Conservation Design generated by the Southern Sierra Partnership as part of the report ("Framework"): “Framework for Cooperative Conservation and Climate Adaptation for the Southern Sierra Nevada and Tehachapi Mountains”. See Framework (Section 5.4, Table 8) for low and high goals for climate adaptation of five vegetation systems (oak woodlands, desert scrub, etc)
|
|