Skip to main content
Advanced Search

Filters: Tags: condition (X)

478 results (68ms)   

Filters
Date Range
Extensions
Types
Contacts
Categories
Tag Types
Tag Schemes
View Results as: JSON ATOM CSV
thumbnail
This dataset is a compilation of forest insect, disease and abiotic damage mapped by aerial detection surveys on forested areas in the United States. At this time, the National Aerial Survey Data Standards require only mortality and defoliation data be collected and reported. However, many cooperators collect data on other types of damage and therefore, the national database has been designed to accommodate these data. Low-level flights, typically 1,000 to 2,000 feet above ground level, are used to map forest damage. Observers use paper maps, typically 1:100,000 scale USGS maps, upon which they record the damage. There is also a digital sketchmap system that may be used. The digital system uses GPS to display the...
thumbnail
This dataset is a compilation of forest insect, disease and abiotic damage mapped by aerial detection surveys on forested areas in the United States. At this time, the National Aerial Survey Data Standards require only mortality and defoliation data be collected and reported. However, many cooperators collect data on other types of damage and therefore, the national database has been designed to accommodate these data. Low-level flights, typically 1,000 to 2,000 feet above ground level, are used to map forest damage. Observers use paper maps, typically 1:100,000 scale USGS maps, upon which they record the damage. There is also a digital sketchmap system that may be used. The digital system uses GPS to display the...
thumbnail
This dataset is a compilation of forest insect, disease and abiotic damage mapped by aerial detection surveys on forested areas in the United States. At this time, the National Aerial Survey Data Standards require only mortality and defoliation data be collected and reported. However, many cooperators collect data on other types of damage and therefore, the national database has been designed to accommodate these data. Low-level flights, typically 1,000 to 2,000 feet above ground level, are used to map forest damage. Observers use paper maps, typically 1:100,000 scale USGS maps, upon which they record the damage. There is also a digital sketchmap system that may be used. The digital system uses GPS to display the...
thumbnail
This dataset was last updated 02/2017. This version includes a new tidal restrictions metric that assesses the effect of undersized culverts and bridges on tidal regime.The previous version (3.1) was updated on 05/2016 by incorporating a revised version of the land cover classification, DSLland Version 3.1, developed by UMass, which included the addition of The Nature Conservancy’s Northeast lakes and ponds classification.This dataset depicts the ecological integrity of locations (represented by 30 m grid cells) throughout the northeastern United States based on environmental conditions existing in approximately 2010. Ecological integrity is defined as the ability of an area (e.g., local site or landscape) to sustain...
thumbnail
This dataset is a compilation of forest insect, disease and abiotic damage mapped by aerial detection surveys on forested areas in the United States. At this time, the National Aerial Survey Data Standards require only mortality and defoliation data be collected and reported. However, many cooperators collect data on other types of damage and therefore, the national database has been designed to accommodate these data. Low-level flights, typically 1,000 to 2,000 feet above ground level, are used to map forest damage. Observers use paper maps, typically 1:100,000 scale USGS maps, upon which they record the damage. There is also a digital sketchmap system that may be used. The digital system uses GPS to display the...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near-future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
This layer represents the near-future scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for projected 2025 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales. Please see "cmbrCE and indicators.xlsx" for a complete list of which measures were applied to individual CEs for current...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and Invasive Annual Plant Species. The annual grass index represents a summary score for a CE based upon the amount of the CE itersecting the annual grass model. The summary score is a weighted mean using the following formula. ((C0*0.5+C1*0.05+C2*0.05+C3+0.1+C4*0.1+C5*0.15)/Total Count)/0.5 *where C is the cell count by category. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation...
thumbnail
This layer represents the near-future scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for projected 2025 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales. Please see "cmbrCE and indicators.xlsx" for a complete list of which measures were applied to individual CEs for current...
thumbnail
NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales The layer represents the scorecard of multiple indicator values of ecosytem/species integrity. Individual layers for ecosystems may have representitive values of change in extent, landscape condition, landscape connectivity, Fire Regime Departure, or invasive annual grass risk. Not...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near-future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
This layer represents the near-future scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for projected 2025 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales. Please see "cmbrCE and indicators.xlsx" for a complete list of which measures were applied to individual CEs for current...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near-future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales The layer represents the scorecard of multiple indicator values of ecosytem/species integrity. Individual layers for ecosystems may have representitive values of change in extent, landscape condition, landscape connectivity, Fire Regime Departure, or invasive annual grass risk. Not...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and Invasive Annual Plant Species. The annual grass index represents a summary score for a CE based upon the amount of the CE itersecting the annual grass model. The summary score is a weighted mean using the following formula. ((C0*0.5+C1*0.05+C2*0.05+C3+0.1+C4*0.1+C5*0.15)/Total Count)/0.5 *where C is the cell count by category. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at...
thumbnail
NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales The layer represents the scorecard of multiple indicator values of ecosytem/species integrity. Individual layers for ecosystems may have representitive values of change in extent, landscape condition, landscape connectivity, Fire Regime Departure, or invasive annual grass risk. Not...
thumbnail
NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales The layer represents the scorecard of multiple indicator values of ecosytem/species integrity. Individual layers for ecosystems may have representitive values of change in extent, landscape condition, landscape connectivity, Fire Regime Departure, or invasive annual grass risk. Not...


map background search result map search result map Damage to forested areas in the North Pacific LCC, USA, 2006 Damage to forested areas in the North Pacific LCC, USA, 1999 Damage to forested areas in the North Pacific LCC, USA, 2006 Damage to forested areas in the North Pacific LCC, USA, 2004 Index of Ecological Integrity, Stratified by Ecosystem, Region-wide, Version 3.2, Northeast U.S. BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Desert Tortoise (Sonoran Population) BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Carbonate (Limestone/Dolomite) alpine BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Condition Index: Mojave Mid-Elevation Mixed Desert Scrub BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Near-Term: Great Basin Xeric Mixed Sagebrush Shrubland BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Brewer's Sparrow (migratory) BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Near-Term: North American Warm Desert Pavement BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Invasive Annual Plant Species - Gypsum Soils BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Near-Term: Sonora-Mojave Semi-Desert Chaparral BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Mule Deer (Year-Round) BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment AnnGr Index: Sonora-Mojave Semi-Desert Chaparral BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Invasive Annual Plant Species - Sage Thrasher BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition - Carbonate (Limestone/Dolomite) alpine BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Carbonate (Limestone/Dolomite) alpine BLM REA CBR 2010 Status Assessment: Great Basin Xeric Mixed Sagebrush Shrubland CHANGE BLM REA CBR 2010 Scorecard of condition Greater Sage Grouse Leks - Current Condition BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Desert Tortoise (Sonoran Population) BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Brewer's Sparrow (migratory) BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Invasive Annual Plant Species - Gypsum Soils BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Near-Term: Sonora-Mojave Semi-Desert Chaparral BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment AnnGr Index: Sonora-Mojave Semi-Desert Chaparral BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Near-Term: Great Basin Xeric Mixed Sagebrush Shrubland BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Near-Term: North American Warm Desert Pavement BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Condition Index: Mojave Mid-Elevation Mixed Desert Scrub BLM REA CBR 2010 Scorecard of condition Greater Sage Grouse Leks - Current Condition BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Carbonate (Limestone/Dolomite) alpine BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition - Carbonate (Limestone/Dolomite) alpine BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Carbonate (Limestone/Dolomite) alpine BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Invasive Annual Plant Species - Sage Thrasher BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Mule Deer (Year-Round) BLM REA CBR 2010 Status Assessment: Great Basin Xeric Mixed Sagebrush Shrubland CHANGE Damage to forested areas in the North Pacific LCC, USA, 1999 Damage to forested areas in the North Pacific LCC, USA, 2004 Damage to forested areas in the North Pacific LCC, USA, 2006 Damage to forested areas in the North Pacific LCC, USA, 2006 Index of Ecological Integrity, Stratified by Ecosystem, Region-wide, Version 3.2, Northeast U.S.