Skip to main content
Advanced Search

Filters: Tags: condition (X)

478 results (37ms)   

Filters
Date Range
Extensions
Types
Contacts
Categories
Tag Types
Tag Schemes
View Results as: JSON ATOM CSV
thumbnail
This dataset is a compilation of forest insect, disease and abiotic damage mapped by aerial detection surveys on forested areas in the United States. At this time, the National Aerial Survey Data Standards require only mortality and defoliation data be collected and reported. However, many cooperators collect data on other types of damage and therefore, the national database has been designed to accommodate these data. Low-level flights, typically 1,000 to 2,000 feet above ground level, are used to map forest damage. Observers use paper maps, typically 1:100,000 scale USGS maps, upon which they record the damage. There is also a digital sketchmap system that may be used. The digital system uses GPS to display the...
thumbnail
This dataset is a compilation of forest insect, disease and abiotic damage mapped by aerial detection surveys on forested areas in the United States. At this time, the National Aerial Survey Data Standards require only mortality and defoliation data be collected and reported. However, many cooperators collect data on other types of damage and therefore, the national database has been designed to accommodate these data. Low-level flights, typically 1,000 to 2,000 feet above ground level, are used to map forest damage. Observers use paper maps, typically 1:100,000 scale USGS maps, upon which they record the damage. There is also a digital sketchmap system that may be used. The digital system uses GPS to display the...
thumbnail
This dataset is a compilation of forest insect, disease and abiotic damage mapped by aerial detection surveys on forested areas in the United States. At this time, the National Aerial Survey Data Standards require only mortality and defoliation data be collected and reported. However, many cooperators collect data on other types of damage and therefore, the national database has been designed to accommodate these data. Low-level flights, typically 1,000 to 2,000 feet above ground level, are used to map forest damage. Observers use paper maps, typically 1:100,000 scale USGS maps, upon which they record the damage. There is also a digital sketchmap system that may be used. The digital system uses GPS to display the...
thumbnail
This dataset is a compilation of forest insect, disease and abiotic damage mapped by aerial detection surveys on forested areas in the United States. At this time, the National Aerial Survey Data Standards require only mortality and defoliation data be collected and reported. However, many cooperators collect data on other types of damage and therefore, the national database has been designed to accommodate these data. Low-level flights, typically 1,000 to 2,000 feet above ground level, are used to map forest damage. Observers use paper maps, typically 1:100,000 scale USGS maps, upon which they record the damage. There is also a digital sketchmap system that may be used. The digital system uses GPS to display the...
thumbnail
This dataset was last updated 02/2017. This version includes a new tidal restrictions metric that assesses the effect of undersized culverts and bridges on tidal regime.The previous version (3.1) was updated on 05/2016 by incorporating a revised version of the land cover classification, DSLland Version 3.1, developed by UMass, which included the addition of The Nature Conservancy’s Northeast lakes and ponds classification.This dataset depicts the ecological integrity of locations (represented by 30 m grid cells) throughout the northeastern United States based on environmental conditions existing in approximately 2010. Ecological integrity is defined as the ability of an area (e.g., local site or landscape) to sustain...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
This layer represents the scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for SNK 2010 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales.
thumbnail
This layer represents the scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for SNK 2010 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales.
thumbnail
This layer represents the scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for SNK 2010 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales.
thumbnail
This layer represents the scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for SNK 2010 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales.
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near-future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near-future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near-future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
This map contains:Aquatic Intactness results for the State of Utah and the Colorado Plateau Ecoregion, HUC6/12-Digit HUC resolution.Aquatic Species Intactness results clipped to 22 different species' distributions, showing the AI status/condition for each of these species of interest in Utah and the COP. An experimental Aquatic Intactness model for the Escalante subregion, which tests a methodology to incorporate detailed/specialized datasets available for only a portion of the study site into the model without penalizing no-data areas in the final intactness score. The Escalante experimental model utilizes two additional themes: riparian vegetation conversion and grazing impact. Unfortunately Grand Staircase National...
thumbnail
This map contains:Aquatic Intactness results for the State of Utah and the Colorado Plateau Ecoregion, HUC6/12-Digit HUC resolution.Aquatic Species Intactness results clipped to 22 different species' distributions, showing the AI status/condition for each of these species of interest in Utah and the COP. An experimental Aquatic Intactness model for the Escalante subregion, which tests a methodology to incorporate detailed/specialized datasets available for only a portion of the study site into the model without penalizing no-data areas in the final intactness score. The Escalante experimental model utilizes two additional themes: riparian vegetation conversion and grazing impact. Unfortunately Grand Staircase National...
thumbnail
This map contains:Aquatic Intactness results for the State of Utah and the Colorado Plateau Ecoregion, HUC6/12-Digit HUC resolution.Aquatic Species Intactness results clipped to 22 different species' distributions, showing the AI status/condition for each of these species of interest in Utah and the COP. An experimental Aquatic Intactness model for the Escalante subregion, which tests a methodology to incorporate detailed/specialized datasets available for only a portion of the study site into the model without penalizing no-data areas in the final intactness score. The Escalante experimental model utilizes two additional themes: riparian vegetation conversion and grazing impact. Unfortunately Grand Staircase National...
thumbnail
This layer represents the near-future scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for projected 2025 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales. Please see "cmbrCE and indicators.xlsx" for a complete list of which measures were applied to individual CEs for current...


map background search result map search result map Damage to forested areas in the North Pacific LCC, USA, 2006 Damage to forested areas in the North Pacific LCC, USA, 1999 Damage to forested areas in the North Pacific LCC, USA, 2006 Damage to forested areas in the North Pacific LCC, USA, 2004 Parking Areas, Tule Lake NWR Index of Ecological Integrity, Stratified by Ecosystem, Region-wide, Version 3.2, Northeast U.S. BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Desert Tortoise (Sonoran Population) BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Carbonate (Limestone/Dolomite) alpine BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Brewer's Sparrow (migratory) BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Near-Term: North American Warm Desert Pavement BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Gila Monster BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 714068 Cackling Goose BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 9901 Arctic Mesic Tundra BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 9376 Boreal Black Spruce Dwarf Tree Peatland BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 5328 Arctic Mesic Alder BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Carbonate (Limestone/Dolomite) alpine BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition - Clay Soils BLM REA COP 2014 UCS UTAH Aquatic Intactness  553395 Virgin River Chub BLM REA COP 2014 UCS UTAH Aquatic Intactness  913987 Northern Leatherside Chub BLM REA COP 2014 UCS UTAH COP Aquatic Intactness BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Desert Tortoise (Sonoran Population) BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Gila Monster BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Brewer's Sparrow (migratory) BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Near-Term: North American Warm Desert Pavement BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 9376 Boreal Black Spruce Dwarf Tree Peatland BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Carbonate (Limestone/Dolomite) alpine BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Carbonate (Limestone/Dolomite) alpine BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 714068 Cackling Goose BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 9901 Arctic Mesic Tundra BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 5328 Arctic Mesic Alder BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition - Clay Soils Damage to forested areas in the North Pacific LCC, USA, 1999 Damage to forested areas in the North Pacific LCC, USA, 2004 Damage to forested areas in the North Pacific LCC, USA, 2006 Damage to forested areas in the North Pacific LCC, USA, 2006 BLM REA COP 2014 UCS UTAH Aquatic Intactness  553395 Virgin River Chub BLM REA COP 2014 UCS UTAH Aquatic Intactness  913987 Northern Leatherside Chub BLM REA COP 2014 UCS UTAH COP Aquatic Intactness Index of Ecological Integrity, Stratified by Ecosystem, Region-wide, Version 3.2, Northeast U.S. Parking Areas, Tule Lake NWR