Skip to main content
Advanced Search

Filters: Tags: aquatic (X) > partyWithName: Appalachian Landscape Conservation Cooperative (X)

9 results (190ms)   

Filters
Date Range
Extensions
Types
Contacts
Categories
Tag Types
Tag Schemes
View Results as: JSON ATOM CSV
thumbnail
All Conservation Design Elements identified through a multi-year conservation planning effort undertaken by the Appalachian Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC). These elements were identified by the program Marxan as meeting collective conservation targets. Datasets include a merged design of all five elements, individual element shapefiles, and a prioritization shapefile (Conservation Design elements outlined by the NatureScape Design that were then placed into a prioritization framework based on Margulis and Pressy 2000).
thumbnail
Aquatic Planning Units are derived from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Hydrography Dataset (NHD)+ v. 2 catchments. They contain information used throughout the NatureScape (landscape conservation design) development. The tables include summaries of information within each catchment including predictor variables. See SI.
thumbnail
Terrestrial-based planning units of 1 kilometer (km) hexagons. There are about 600,000 units populated with conservation targets from around the Appalachian region. One of the targets included is the optimization from the Aquatics-only target scenario. The tables include summaries of information within each catchment including predictor variables.
thumbnail
These datasets are products of Phase II of the Appalachian Landscape Conservation Cooperative’s (LCC) landscape conservation design (LCD) created by Clemson University as part of the LCC-funded project, “Interactive Conservation Planning for the Appalachian LCC”. The Appalachian NatureScape Design incorporates and models newly developed data and information from all Appalachian LCC funded research projects as well as key existing datasets from partners to produce a series of maps that integrate aquatic connectivity with terrestrial significant habitats to guide conservation planning and decision making.Conservation Planning, a process of spatially identifying and prioritizing lands and waters important for functioning...
Categories: Data; Tags: Academics & scientific researchers, AppLCC, Appalachian, Conservation NGOs, Conservation Plan/Design/Framework, All tags...
thumbnail
Aquatic connectivity was modeled across the entire Landscape Conservation Cooperative geography at the catchmentand watershed scales. To evaluate aquatic connectivity, the density of dams and road crossings was used as these areknown to disrupt connectivity within aquatic systems. Connectivity data for dams and road crossings werecreated from the StreamCat database. The density of dams and roads was multiplied, at the catchment and watershedlevels, by the relative influence of each connectivity variable in the Boosted Regression Tree (BRT) models and then the connectivity variables were averaged. A single aquatic connectivity score was then assigned to each catchment. This aquaticconnectivity score was used to modify...


    map background search result map search result map Upper Tennessee River Basin Aquatic Conservation Projects NatureScape Design_Landscape Conservation Design II Grouped Data NatureScape, Aquatic Appalachian LCC Final Watershed Scores NatureScape, Design NatureScape, Aquatic Modeling NatureScape, Integrated Planning Units Tennessee River Basin Aquatic Conservation Projects NatureScape, Aquatic Modeling Catchment Scores Tennessee State Wildlife Action Plan 2015 Aquatic Habitat Priorities Upper Tennessee River Basin Aquatic Conservation Projects Tennessee River Basin Aquatic Conservation Projects Tennessee State Wildlife Action Plan 2015 Aquatic Habitat Priorities NatureScape Design_Landscape Conservation Design II Grouped Data NatureScape, Aquatic Appalachian LCC Final Watershed Scores NatureScape, Design NatureScape, Aquatic Modeling NatureScape, Integrated Planning Units NatureScape, Aquatic Modeling Catchment Scores