Skip to main content
Advanced Search

Filters: Tags: Valley fill (X)

40 results (139ms)   

Filters
Date Range
Types
Contacts
Categories
Tag Types
Tag Schemes
View Results as: JSON ATOM CSV
thumbnail
This dataset includes spreadsheets with statistical data (mean and median absolute error) used in deciding which interpolation method best fit the corresponding dataset. All statistical data were paired with a visual inspection of the interpolation prior to determining the final raster product. All spreadsheets were generated using an automated python script (Jahn, 2020).
thumbnail
This dataset includes well logs used in the creation of the Cortland hydrogeologic framework. Well logs were used from multiple sources (DEC, DOT, NWIS) and were a crucial component in generating hydrogeologic layer elevations and thicknesses. Well logs are available in their original form on GeoLog Locator (https://webapps.usgs.gov/GeoLogLocator/#!/) and provided here in the digitized form (shapefiles and feature classes), which were used in the generation of the hydrogeologic framework.
thumbnail
Digital hydrogeologic datasets were developed for the Rondout-Neversink study area in upstate New York in cooperation with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. These datasets define the hydrogeologic framework of the valley-fill aquifer and surrounding till-covered uplands within the study area. Datasets include: bedrock elevation raster, lacustrine silt and clay top and bottom elevation rasters, lidar minimum elevation raster, lacustrine extent polygon, valley-fill extent polygon, and surficial geology polygons. Elevation layers were interpolated at 125-foot discretization to match the model grid cell size.
thumbnail
This dataset includes well logs used in the creation of the Olean hydrogeologic framework. Well logs were used from multiple sources (DEC, DOT, NWIS, ESOGIS, and recently digitized archived material) and were a crucial component in generating hydrogeologic layer elevations and thicknesses. Well logs are available in their original form on GeoLog Locator (https://webapps.usgs.gov/GeoLogLocator/#!/) and provided here in the digitized form (shapefiles and feature classes), which were used in the generation of the hydrogeologic framework.
thumbnail
This dataset includes "smoothing points" used in the creation of the Jamestown hydrogeologic framework. Smoothing points were manually added and were used to enhance interpolated layers using geologic assumptions and include: valley edge points, centerline bedrock points, and upland bedrock SSURGO points.
thumbnail
This dataset includes spreadsheets with statistical data (mean and median absolute error) used in deciding which interpolation method best fit the corresponding dataset. All statistical data were paired with a visual inspection of the interpolation prior to determining the final raster product. All spreadsheets were generated using an automated python script (Jahn, 2020).
thumbnail
This dataset includes spreadsheets with statistical data (mean and median absolute error) used in deciding which interpolation method best fit the corresponding dataset. All statistical data were paired with a visual inspection of the interpolation prior to determining the final raster product. All spreadsheets were generated using an automated python script (Jahn, 2020).
thumbnail
This dataset includes georeferenced TIFF files from two separate reports for the Jamestown study area that have been digitized into feature classes within ArcGIS. Not all digitized and georeferenced data was necessarily used in the final interpolations, however they may have contributed to understanding the local hydrogeology.
thumbnail
Digital hydrogeologic datasets were developed for the Greene study area in upstate New York in cooperation with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. These datasets define the hydrogeologic framework of the valley-fill aquifer and surrounding till-covered uplands within the study area. Datasets include: bedrock elevation raster, lacustrine silt and clay top and bottom elevation rasters, lidar minimum elevation raster, lacustrine extent polygon, valley-fill extent polygon, and surficial geology polygons. Elevation layers were interpolated at 125-foot discretization to match the model grid cell size.
thumbnail
Digital hydrogeologic datasets were developed for the Jamestown study area in upstate New York in cooperation with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. These datasets define the hydrogeologic framework of the valley-fill aquifer and surrounding till-covered uplands within the study area. Datasets include: bedrock elevation raster, lacustrine silt and clay top and bottom elevation rasters (where present), LIDAR minimum elevation raster, lacustrine extent polygon, valley-fill extent polygon, and surficial geology polygons. Elevation layers were interpolated at 125-foot discretization to match what was done in previous work.
thumbnail
This dataset includes georeferenced TIFF files from two separate reports for the Fishkill and Wappinger Falls study area that have been digitized into feature classes within ArcGIS. Not all digitized and georeferenced data was necessarily used in the final interpolations, however they may have contributed to understanding the local hydrogeology.
thumbnail
This dataset includes georeferenced tiff files from two separate reports for the Greene study area, where appropriate data have been digitized into feature classes within ArcGIS. Not all digitized and georeferenced data was necessarily used in the final interpolations, however they may have contributed to understanding the local hydrogeology
thumbnail
This dataset includes georeferenced tiff files from two separate reports for the Cortland study area that have been digitized into feature classes within ArcGIS. Not all digitized and georeferenced data was necessarily used in the final interpolations, however they may have contributed to understanding the local hydrogeology
thumbnail
This dataset includes georeferenced tiff files from three separate reports for the Rondout Neversink study area that have been digitized into feature classes within ArcGIS. Not all digitized and georeferenced data was necessarily used in the final interpolations, however they may have contributed to understanding the local hydrogeology.
thumbnail
This dataset includes "smoothing points" used in the creation of the Fishkill and Wappinger Falls hydrogeologic framework. Smoothing points were manually added and were used to enhance interpolated layers using geologic assumptions and include: valley edge points, report points, and upland bedrock SSURGO points.
thumbnail
This dataset includes well logs used in the creation of the Cincinnatus hydrogeologic framework. Well logs were used from multiple sources (DEC, DOT, NWIS) and were a crucial component in generating hydrogeologic layer elevations and thicknesses. Well logs are available in their original form on GeoLog Locator (https://webapps.usgs.gov/GeoLogLocator/#!/) and provided here in the digitized form (shapefiles and feature classes), which were used in the generation of the hydrogeologic framework.
thumbnail
This dataset includes "smoothing points" used in the creation of the Cincinnatus hydrogeologic framework. Smoothing points were manually added by the project team and were used to enhance interpolated layers using geologic assumptions and include: valley edge points, centerline bedrock points (and where applicable L1 and L2 points), and upland bedrock SURGO points.
thumbnail
This dataset includes spreadsheets with statistical data (mean and median absolute error) used in deciding which interpolation method best fit the corresponding dataset. All statistical data were paired with a visual inspection of the interpolation prior to determining the final raster product. All spreadsheets were generated using an automated python script (Jahn, 2020).
thumbnail
This dataset includes "smoothing points" used in the creation of the Roundout Neversink hydrogeologic framework. Smoothing points were manually added by the project team and were used to enhance interpolated layers using geologic assumptions and include: valley edge points, centerline bedrock points (and where applicable L1 and L2 points), and upland bedrock SURGO points.
This dataset includes spreadsheets with statistical data (mean and median absolute error) used in deciding which interpolation method best fit the corresponding dataset. All statistical data were paired with a visual inspection of the interpolation prior to determining the final raster product. All spreadsheets were generated using an automated python script (Jahn, 2020).


map background search result map search result map Cortland study area georeferenced TIFFs and digitized data Well Logs for the Cortland sourcewater study area in upstate New York Greene study area hydrogeologic framework layers Greene study area georeferenced TIFFs and digitized data Well Logs for the Greene sourcewater study area in upstate New York Rondout Neversink study area hydrogeologic framework layers Roundout Neversink study area georeferenced TIFFs and digitized data Supplementary Points for the Cincinnatus sourcewater study area in upstate New York Supplementary Points for the Rondout Neversink sourcewater study area in upstate New York Supplementary Points for the Jamestown sourcewater study area in upstate New York Jamestown study area georeferenced TIFFs and digitized data Fishkill and Wappinger Falls study area georeferenced TIFFs and digitized data Jamestown study area hydrogeologic framework layers Supplementary Points for the Fishkill and Wappinger Falls sourcewater study area in upstate New York Well Logs for the Olean sourcewater study area in upstate New York Interpolation statistics for the Ellicottville sourcewater study area in upstate New York Interpolation statistics for the Fishkill and Wappinger Falls sourcewater study area in upstate New York Interpolation statistics for the Olean sourcewater study area in upstate New York Interpolation statistics for the Cortland sourcewater study area in upstate New York Interpolation statistics for the Greene sourcewater study area in upstate New York Greene study area hydrogeologic framework layers Interpolation statistics for the Greene sourcewater study area in upstate New York Interpolation statistics for the Ellicottville sourcewater study area in upstate New York Interpolation statistics for the Cortland sourcewater study area in upstate New York Cortland study area georeferenced TIFFs and digitized data Rondout Neversink study area hydrogeologic framework layers Well Logs for the Olean sourcewater study area in upstate New York Well Logs for the Cortland sourcewater study area in upstate New York Supplementary Points for the Cincinnatus sourcewater study area in upstate New York Well Logs for the Greene sourcewater study area in upstate New York Interpolation statistics for the Olean sourcewater study area in upstate New York Jamestown study area georeferenced TIFFs and digitized data Jamestown study area hydrogeologic framework layers Supplementary Points for the Jamestown sourcewater study area in upstate New York Greene study area georeferenced TIFFs and digitized data Supplementary Points for the Rondout Neversink sourcewater study area in upstate New York Interpolation statistics for the Fishkill and Wappinger Falls sourcewater study area in upstate New York Roundout Neversink study area georeferenced TIFFs and digitized data Supplementary Points for the Fishkill and Wappinger Falls sourcewater study area in upstate New York Fishkill and Wappinger Falls study area georeferenced TIFFs and digitized data