Skip to main content
Advanced Search

Filters: Tags: Land Use Planning (X)

474 results (7ms)   

View Results as: JSON ATOM CSV
thumbnail
Sustained Yield Units (SYU) within the Western Oregon Plan Revision (WOPR) area. SYU boundaries were derived from the FOI dataset and DOB boundaries.BLM: (Bureau of Land Management) WOPR: (Western Oregon Plan Revision) SYU: (Sustained Yield Unit) PRMP: (Proposed Resource Management Plan) This data is a PRMP release version of the data lup_aa_a_syu_poly.
thumbnail
ACECs are areas where special management is needed to protect important historical, cultural, or scenic values, fish and wildlife resources, or other natural systems or processes, or to identify areas hazardous to human life and property. Criteria for ACECs can be found at: BLM Manual 1613 and 43 CFR 1610.7-2(b). RNAs are areas where natural processes are allowed to predominate and which is preserved for the primary purposes of research and education. Under current BLM policy, RNAs must meet the relevance and importance criteria of ACECs and are designated as ACECs. Criteria for RNAs can be found at: BLM Manual 1613 and 43 CFR 1610.7-2(b). ONAs are areas with high scenic values that have been little altered by human...
thumbnail
Outstanding Natural Areas within Western Oregon. This theme represents the third iteration of the effort to arrive at a preferred approach to the management of the recreation resource. This theme reflects the management approach approved in the Record of Decision.BLM (Bureau of Land Management), WOPR (Western Oregon Plan Revision) ADS (Automated Digitizing System), MOSS (Map Overlay Statistical System) PRMP (Proposed Resource Management Plan) This data is a PRMP release version of the data. The original name of the dataset is:lup_aa_a_ona_poly
thumbnail
This dataset represents recreation trails within the Western Oregon Plan Revision (WOPR) boundary.BLM (Bureau of Land Management) WOPR (Western Oregon Plan Revision) PRMP: (Proposed Resource Management Plan) REC: (Recreation)
thumbnail
BLM Resource Area Boundaries within the Western Oregon Plan Revision (WOPR) Proposed Resource Management Plan (PRMP) boundary. These resource area boundaries were modified along edges of the Western Oregon Plan Revision updated Analysis of Mangement Situatiion (AMS) project boundary and are intended for use in analytical summaries.BLM: (Bureau of Land Management) WOPR: (Western Oregon Plan Revision), POL: (Political) PRMP: (Proposed Resource Mangement Plan) AMS: (Analysis of Management Situation) RAB: (Resource Area Boundary) LUP: (Land Use Planning)
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
This layer represents the scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for SNK 2010 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales.
thumbnail
This layer represents the scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for SNK 2010 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales.
thumbnail
This layer represents the scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for SNK 2010 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales.
thumbnail
This layer represents the scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for SNK 2010 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales.
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near-future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near-future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near-future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
This dataset shows unsettled state and native land claims at the section level filtered from general land status records in 2011 Land Information System Database downloaded from ASGDC. The Land Status attributes are a snapshot of the Land Information System Database and are only accurate as that database. The data is produced to the section (square mile) level.
thumbnail
This coverage displays the non-surveyed boundaries of active (recorded or interim) federal mining claims within the State of Alaska. Each mining claim is represented as an individual region, identified by the casefile serial number which can be linked to background data via the ALIS (Alaska Land Information System). Mining claim boundaries were identified in location notices from the original casefiles. They were plotted on maps based on rough sketches, claimant maps or physical descriptions. The mining claim boundaries were transferred (when applicable) by use of a zoom-transfer scope and light table from claimant maps or estimated from land descriptions onto 1:63,360 quadrangle maps. Claims were then digitized...
thumbnail
This simple assessment raster is used to answer management questions (MQs) about where change agents (CAs) overlap with BLM high biodiversity sites (HBS) in the Central Great Basin and Range Ecoregion. This is a basic footprint assessment of anthropogenic features (urban development, roads, etc) intersect with the areas of HBS. The HBS were derived from source data characterizing locations with concentrated at-risk biodiversity or existing source data of a prioritization exercise that identified areas of high conservation significance. It does not model actual response or condition of the HBS to the CAs. The data intersects two primary classes of information: The CAs consist of 19 classes which represent different...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and Invasive Annual Plant Species. The annual grass index represents a summary score for a CE based upon the amount of the CE itersecting the annual grass model. The summary score is a weighted mean using the following formula. ((C0*0.5+C1*0.05+C2*0.05+C3+0.1+C4*0.1+C5*0.15)/Total Count)/0.5 *where C is the cell count by category. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation...
thumbnail
This simple assessment layer is used to answer management questions (MQs) about which high biodiversity sites (HBS) will experience significant climate change in the near future scenario in the Mojave Basin and Range Ecoregion. This is a basic intersect of areas that will likely experience significant climate change effects with the areas that have been identified by previous 3rd party analyses as having extraordinary biodiversity. It does not model actual response or condition of the HBS to climate change. Nearly all HBS in the ecoregion will experience significant effects according to the criteria that were selected. The climate space trends data layer was used to ascertain areas of significant climate changes....


map background search result map search result map Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACECs), Research Natural Areas (RNAs), and Outstanding Natural Areas (ONAs) of Idaho WOPR Outstanding Natural Areas (Polygon) WOPR Recreation Trails Arc WOPR Resource Area Boundaries Polygon WOPR Sustained Yield Unit Boundaries Polygon BLM REA YKL 2011 YKL DV C Alaska FederalMiningClaims BLM REA YKL 2011 Unsettled State and Native Land Claims in the Yukon River Lowlands - Kuskokwim Mountains - Lime Hills BLM REA MBR 2010 CBR Footprint Assessment Change Agent/High Biodiversity Sites Intersect BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Desert Tortoise (Sonoran Population) BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Carbonate (Limestone/Dolomite) alpine BLM REA MBR 2010 High Biodiversity Sites Potentially Affected by Significant Climate Change BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Brewer's Sparrow (migratory) BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Invasive Annual Plant Species - Gypsum Soils BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Gila Monster BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 714068 Cackling Goose BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 9901 Arctic Mesic Tundra BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 9376 Boreal Black Spruce Dwarf Tree Peatland BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 5328 Arctic Mesic Alder BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Carbonate (Limestone/Dolomite) alpine BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition - Clay Soils BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Desert Tortoise (Sonoran Population) BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Gila Monster WOPR Recreation Trails Arc WOPR Outstanding Natural Areas (Polygon) BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Brewer's Sparrow (migratory) WOPR Resource Area Boundaries Polygon WOPR Sustained Yield Unit Boundaries Polygon BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Invasive Annual Plant Species - Gypsum Soils BLM REA MBR 2010 High Biodiversity Sites Potentially Affected by Significant Climate Change BLM REA MBR 2010 CBR Footprint Assessment Change Agent/High Biodiversity Sites Intersect BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 9376 Boreal Black Spruce Dwarf Tree Peatland Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACECs), Research Natural Areas (RNAs), and Outstanding Natural Areas (ONAs) of Idaho BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Carbonate (Limestone/Dolomite) alpine BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Carbonate (Limestone/Dolomite) alpine BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 714068 Cackling Goose BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 9901 Arctic Mesic Tundra BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 5328 Arctic Mesic Alder BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition - Clay Soils BLM REA YKL 2011 Unsettled State and Native Land Claims in the Yukon River Lowlands - Kuskokwim Mountains - Lime Hills BLM REA YKL 2011 YKL DV C Alaska FederalMiningClaims