Skip to main content
Advanced Search

Filters: Tags: Fire regime departure (X)

170 results (111ms)   

View Results as: JSON ATOM CSV
thumbnail
NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales The layer represents the scorecard of multiple indicator values of ecosytem/species integrity. Individual layers for ecosystems may have representitive values of change in extent, landscape condition, landscape connectivity, Fire Regime Departure, or invasive annual grass risk. Not...
thumbnail
NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales The layer represents the scorecard of multiple indicator values of ecosytem/species integrity. Individual layers for ecosystems may have representitive values of change in extent, landscape condition, landscape connectivity, Fire Regime Departure, or invasive annual grass risk. Not...
thumbnail
NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales The layer represents the scorecard of multiple indicator values of ecosytem/species integrity. Individual layers for ecosystems may have representitive values of change in extent, landscape condition, landscape connectivity, Fire Regime Departure, or invasive annual grass risk. Not...
thumbnail
NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales The layer represents the scorecard of multiple indicator values of ecosytem/species integrity. Individual layers for ecosystems may have representitive values of change in extent, landscape condition, landscape connectivity, Fire Regime Departure, or invasive annual grass risk. Not...
thumbnail
NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales The layer represents the scorecard of multiple indicator values of ecosytem/species integrity. Individual layers for ecosystems may have representitive values of change in extent, landscape condition, landscape connectivity, Fire Regime Departure, or invasive annual grass risk. Not...
thumbnail
NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales The layer represents the scorecard of multiple indicator values of ecosytem/species integrity. Individual layers for ecosystems may have representitive values of change in extent, landscape condition, landscape connectivity, Fire Regime Departure, or invasive annual grass risk. Not...
thumbnail
NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales The layer represents the scorecard of multiple indicator values of ecosytem/species integrity. Individual layers for ecosystems may have representitive values of change in extent, landscape condition, landscape connectivity, Fire Regime Departure, or invasive annual grass risk. Not...
thumbnail
NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales The layer represents the scorecard of multiple indicator values of ecosytem/species integrity. Individual layers for ecosystems may have representitive values of change in extent, landscape condition, landscape connectivity, Fire Regime Departure, or invasive annual grass risk. Not...
thumbnail
NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales The layer represents the scorecard of multiple indicator values of ecosytem/species integrity. Individual layers for ecosystems may have representitive values of change in extent, landscape condition, landscape connectivity, Fire Regime Departure, or invasive annual grass risk. Not...
thumbnail
NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales The layer represents the scorecard of multiple indicator values of ecosytem/species integrity. Individual layers for ecosystems may have representitive values of change in extent, landscape condition, landscape connectivity, Fire Regime Departure, or invasive annual grass risk. Not...
thumbnail
NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales The layer represents the scorecard of multiple indicator values of ecosytem/species integrity. Individual layers for ecosystems may have representitive values of change in extent, landscape condition, landscape connectivity, Fire Regime Departure, or invasive annual grass risk. Not...
thumbnail
NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales The layer represents the scorecard of multiple indicator values of ecosytem/species integrity. Individual layers for ecosystems may have representitive values of change in extent, landscape condition, landscape connectivity, Fire Regime Departure, or invasive annual grass risk. Not...
thumbnail
NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales The layer represents the scorecard of multiple indicator values of ecosytem/species integrity. Individual layers for ecosystems may have representitive values of change in extent, landscape condition, landscape connectivity, Fire Regime Departure, or invasive annual grass risk. Not...
thumbnail
NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales The layer represents the scorecard of multiple indicator values of ecosytem/species integrity. Individual layers for ecosystems may have representitive values of change in extent, landscape condition, landscape connectivity, Fire Regime Departure, or invasive annual grass risk. Not...
thumbnail
NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales The layer represents the scorecard of multiple indicator values of ecosytem/species integrity. Individual layers for ecosystems may have representitive values of change in extent, landscape condition, landscape connectivity, Fire Regime Departure, or invasive annual grass risk. Not...
thumbnail
NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales The layer represents the scorecard of multiple indicator values of ecosytem/species integrity. Individual layers for ecosystems may have representitive values of change in extent, landscape condition, landscape connectivity, Fire Regime Departure, or invasive annual grass risk. Not...
thumbnail
NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales The layer represents the scorecard of multiple indicator values of ecosytem/species integrity. Individual layers for ecosystems may have representitive values of change in extent, landscape condition, landscape connectivity, Fire Regime Departure, or invasive annual grass risk. Not...
thumbnail
NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales The layer represents the scorecard of multiple indicator values of ecosytem/species integrity. Individual layers for ecosystems may have representitive values of change in extent, landscape condition, landscape connectivity, Fire Regime Departure, or invasive annual grass risk. Not...
thumbnail
NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales The layer represents the scorecard of multiple indicator values of ecosytem/species integrity. Individual layers for ecosystems may have representitive values of change in extent, landscape condition, landscape connectivity, Fire Regime Departure, or invasive annual grass risk. Not...
thumbnail
NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales The layer represents the scorecard of multiple indicator values of ecosytem/species integrity. Individual layers for ecosystems may have representitive values of change in extent, landscape condition, landscape connectivity, Fire Regime Departure, or invasive annual grass risk. Not...


map background search result map search result map BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Condition Index: North American Warm Desert Bedrock Cliff and Outcrop BLM REA MBR 2010 Scorecard of condition CommonKingsnake BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Condition Index: Sonora-Mojave Creosotebush-White Bursage Desert Scrub BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment: Mojave Mid-Elevation Mixed Desert Scrub Mesic BLM REA MBR 2010 Scorecard of condition Condition Index - Sonoran Mid-Elevation Desert Scrub BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Departure: Great Basin Xeric Mixed Sagebrush Shrubland BLM REA MBR 2010 Scorecard of condition GilaMonster BLM REA CBR 2010 Status Assessmentt: Inter-Mountain Basins Subalpine Limber-Bristlecone Pine Woodland CHANGE BLM REA CBR 2010 Scorecard of condition BigBrownBat BLM REA CBR 2010 Status Assessment: nter-Mountain Basins Aspen-Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland DEPARTURE BLM REA CBR 2010 Status Assessment: Inter-Mountain Basins Montane Sagebrush Steppe CONDITION INDEX BLM REA CBR 2010 Scorecard of condition Greater Sage Grouse Leks 50 - Future Condition BLM REA CBR 2010 Status Assessment: Great Basin Pinyon Juniper Woodland CONDITION INDEX BLM REA CBR 2010 Scorecard of condition SavannahSparrow BLM REA CBR 2010 Status Assessment: Great Basin Pinyon Juniper Woodland DEPARTURE BLM REA CBR 2010 Status Assessent: Inter-Mountain Basins Semi-Desert Grassland DEPARTURE BLM REA CBR 2010 Status Assessment: Inter-Mountain Basins Montane Sagebrush Steppe ANN GRASS INDEX BLM REA CBR 2010 Status Assessment: Inter-Mountain Basins Big Sagebrush Steppe CONDITION INDEX BLM REA CBR 2010 Scorecard of condition Greater Sage Grouse Leks 25 - Current Annual Grass BLM REA CBR 2010 Status Assessment: Inter-Mountain Basins Curl-leaf Mountain Mahogany Woodland and Shrubland DEPARTURE BLM REA MBR 2010 Scorecard of condition GilaMonster BLM REA MBR 2010 Scorecard of condition Condition Index - Sonoran Mid-Elevation Desert Scrub BLM REA CBR 2010 Scorecard of condition Greater Sage Grouse Leks 25 - Current Annual Grass BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Condition Index: North American Warm Desert Bedrock Cliff and Outcrop BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment: Mojave Mid-Elevation Mixed Desert Scrub Mesic BLM REA CBR 2010 Scorecard of condition Greater Sage Grouse Leks 50 - Future Condition BLM REA CBR 2010 Scorecard of condition SavannahSparrow BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Condition Index: Sonora-Mojave Creosotebush-White Bursage Desert Scrub BLM REA CBR 2010 Status Assessmentt: Inter-Mountain Basins Subalpine Limber-Bristlecone Pine Woodland CHANGE BLM REA MBR 2010 Scorecard of condition CommonKingsnake BLM REA CBR 2010 Status Assessment: Inter-Mountain Basins Big Sagebrush Steppe CONDITION INDEX BLM REA CBR 2010 Status Assessent: Inter-Mountain Basins Semi-Desert Grassland DEPARTURE BLM REA CBR 2010 Status Assessment: nter-Mountain Basins Aspen-Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland DEPARTURE BLM REA CBR 2010 Status Assessment: Inter-Mountain Basins Curl-leaf Mountain Mahogany Woodland and Shrubland DEPARTURE BLM REA CBR 2010 Status Assessment: Inter-Mountain Basins Montane Sagebrush Steppe CONDITION INDEX BLM REA CBR 2010 Status Assessment: Inter-Mountain Basins Montane Sagebrush Steppe ANN GRASS INDEX BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Departure: Great Basin Xeric Mixed Sagebrush Shrubland BLM REA CBR 2010 Scorecard of condition BigBrownBat BLM REA CBR 2010 Status Assessment: Great Basin Pinyon Juniper Woodland CONDITION INDEX BLM REA CBR 2010 Status Assessment: Great Basin Pinyon Juniper Woodland DEPARTURE