Skip to main content
Advanced Search

Filters: Tags: DFA (X)

14 results (10ms)   

View Results as: JSON ATOM CSV
thumbnail
This data represents a draft “Integrated” alternative from the DRECP Description and Comparative Evaluation of Draft DRECP Alternatives dated December 17, 2012. Each integrated alternative is comprised of three primary elements: Renewable Energy Development areas, Conservation Area Reserve System areas, and Other Lands.The Renewable Energy Development areas include Development Focus Areas (DFAs) in all alternatives and in Alternatives 1, 6, and 7 also include Solar PEIS Variance lands.The Conservation Area Reserve System includes three components: the BLM Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) areas, Conservation Planning Areas, and Existing Conservation. The BLM LUPA areas are comprised of Desert Conservation Lands...
thumbnail
This dataset represents current terrestrial intactness values (estimated at the 1km level) within the development focus areas for Alternative1 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION).Terrestrial intactness is high in areas where development is low, vegetation intactness is high, and fragmentation is low. Consequently, this dataset serves as a general* indication of habitat quality within the development focus areas for this alternative. Estimates of current terrestrial intactness were generated by an EEMS fuzzy logic model that integrates multiple measures of landscape development and vegetation intactness, including agriculture development (from LANDFIRE EVT v1.1), urban development (from LANDFIRE EVT v1.1 and NLCD Impervious...
thumbnail
This dataset represents current terrestrial intactness values (estimated at the 1km level) within the development focus areas for Alternative 3 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION).Terrestrial intactness is high in areas where development is low, vegetation intactness is high, and fragmentation is low. Consequently, this dataset serves as a general* indication of habitat quality within the development focus areas for this alternative. Estimates of current terrestrial intactness were generated by an EEMS fuzzy logic model that integrates multiple measures of landscape development and vegetation intactness, including agriculture development (from LANDFIRE EVT v1.1), urban development (from LANDFIRE EVT v1.1 and NLCD Impervious...
thumbnail
This data represents a draft “Integrated” alternative from the DRECP Description and Comparative Evaluation of Draft DRECP Alternatives dated December 17, 2012. Each integrated alternative is comprised of three primary elements: Renewable Energy Development areas, Conservation Area Reserve System areas, and Other Lands.The Renewable Energy Development areas include Development Focus Areas (DFAs) in all alternatives and in Alternatives 1, 6, and 7 also include Solar PEIS Variance lands.The Conservation Area Reserve System includes three components: the BLM Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) areas, Conservation Planning Areas, and Existing Conservation. The BLM LUPA areas are comprised of Desert Conservation Lands...
thumbnail
This data represents a draft “Integrated” alternative from the DRECP Description and Comparative Evaluation of Draft DRECP Alternatives dated December 17, 2012. Each integrated alternative is comprised of three primary elements: Renewable Energy Development areas, Conservation Area Reserve System areas, and Other Lands.The Renewable Energy Development areas include Development Focus Areas (DFAs) in all alternatives and in Alternatives 1, 6, and 7 also include Solar PEIS Variance lands.The Conservation Area Reserve System includes three components: the BLM Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) areas, Conservation Planning Areas, and Existing Conservation. The BLM LUPA areas are comprised of Desert Conservation Lands...
thumbnail
This dataset represents current terrestrial intactness values (estimated at the 1km level) within the development focus areas for Alternative 5 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION).Terrestrial intactness is high in areas where development is low, vegetation intactness is high, and fragmentation is low. Consequently, this dataset serves as a general* indication of habitat quality within the development focus areas for this alternative. Estimates of current terrestrial intactness were generated by an EEMS fuzzy logic model that integrates multiple measures of landscape development and vegetation intactness, including agriculture development (from LANDFIRE EVT v1.1), urban development (from LANDFIRE EVT v1.1 and NLCD Impervious...
thumbnail
This dataset represents current terrestrial intactness values (estimated at the 1km level) within the development focus areas for Alternative 2 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION).Terrestrial intactness is high in areas where development is low, vegetation intactness is high, and fragmentation is low. Consequently, this dataset serves as a general* indication of habitat quality within the development focus areas for this alternative. Estimates of current terrestrial intactness were generated by an EEMS fuzzy logic model that integrates multiple measures of landscape development and vegetation intactness, including agriculture development (from LANDFIRE EVT v1.1), urban development (from LANDFIRE EVT v1.1 and NLCD Impervious...
thumbnail
This data represents a draft “Integrated” alternative from the DRECP Description and Comparative Evaluation of Draft DRECP Alternatives dated December 17, 2012. Each integrated alternative is comprised of three primary elements: Renewable Energy Development areas, Conservation Area Reserve System areas, and Other Lands.The Renewable Energy Development areas include Development Focus Areas (DFAs) in all alternatives and in Alternatives 1, 6, and 7 also include Solar PEIS Variance lands.The Conservation Area Reserve System includes three components: the BLM Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) areas, Conservation Planning Areas, and Existing Conservation. The BLM LUPA areas are comprised of Desert Conservation Lands...
thumbnail
This data represents a draft “Integrated” alternative from the DRECP Description and Comparative Evaluation of Draft DRECP Alternatives dated December 17, 2012. Each integrated alternative is comprised of three primary elements: Renewable Energy Development areas, Conservation Area Reserve System areas, and Other Lands.The Renewable Energy Development areas include Development Focus Areas (DFAs) in all alternatives and in Alternatives 1, 6, and 7 also include Solar PEIS Variance lands.The Conservation Area Reserve System includes three components: the BLM Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) areas, Conservation Planning Areas, and Existing Conservation. The BLM LUPA areas are comprised of Desert Conservation Lands...
thumbnail
This data represents a draft “Integrated” alternative from the DRECP Description and Comparative Evaluation of Draft DRECP Alternatives dated December 17, 2012. Each integrated alternative is comprised of three primary elements: Renewable Energy Development areas, Conservation Area Reserve System areas, and Other Lands.The Renewable Energy Development areas include Development Focus Areas (DFAs) in all alternatives and in Alternatives 1, 6, and 7 also include Solar PEIS Variance lands.The Conservation Area Reserve System includes three components: the BLM Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) areas, Conservation Planning Areas, and Existing Conservation. The BLM LUPA areas are comprised of Desert Conservation Lands...
thumbnail
No Action Alternative.The no action alternative assumes that the 20,323 MW renewables energy target will be met by 2040. The estimated technology mix and consequent ground disturbance has not yet been determined.No DFAs or LUPAs are part of the no action alternative. Instead, the no action alternative assumes that development will occur within the 10.3 million acres of the Plan Area that satisfy the minimum resource requirements needed for renewable energy facilities; this includes BLM solar PEIS variance lands. Conservation is assumed to occur in Legally and Legislatively Protected Area (LLPAs) and MEMLs and development is assumed to be excluded from these areas. Further, no solar development would occur within...
thumbnail
This dataset represents current terrestrial intactness values (estimated at the 1km level) within the development focus areas for Alternative 4 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION).Terrestrial intactness is high in areas where development is low, vegetation intactness is high, and fragmentation is low. Consequently, this dataset serves as a general* indication of habitat quality within the development focus areas for this alternative. Estimates of current terrestrial intactness were generated by an EEMS fuzzy logic model that integrates multiple measures of landscape development and vegetation intactness, including agriculture development (from LANDFIRE EVT v1.1), urban development (from LANDFIRE EVT v1.1 and NLCD Impervious...
thumbnail
This dataset represents current terrestrial intactness values (estimated at the 1km level) within the development focus areas for Alternative 7 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION).Terrestrial intactness is high in areas where development is low, vegetation intactness is high, and fragmentation is low. Consequently, this dataset serves as a general* indication of habitat quality within the development focus areas for this alternative. Estimates of current terrestrial intactness were generated by an EEMS fuzzy logic model that integrates multiple measures of landscape development and vegetation intactness, including agriculture development (from LANDFIRE EVT v1.1), urban development (from LANDFIRE EVT v1.1 and NLCD Impervious...
thumbnail
This dataset represents current terrestrial intactness values (estimated at the 1km level) within the development focus areas for Alternative 6 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION).Terrestrial intactness is high in areas where development is low, vegetation intactness is high, and fragmentation is low. Consequently, this dataset serves as a general* indication of habitat quality within the development focus areas for this alternative. Estimates of current terrestrial intactness were generated by an EEMS fuzzy logic model that integrates multiple measures of landscape development and vegetation intactness, including agriculture development (from LANDFIRE EVT v1.1), urban development (from LANDFIRE EVT v1.1 and NLCD Impervious...


    map background search result map search result map Alternative 7 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION), Current Terrestrial Landscape Intactness (1km), DRECP Alternative 6 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION), Current Terrestrial Landscape Intactness (1km), DRECP Alternative 5 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION), Current Terrestrial Landscape Intactness (1km), DRECP Alternative 4 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION), Current Terrestrial Landscape Intactness (1km), DRECP Alternative 3 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION), Current Terrestrial Landscape Intactness (1km), DRECP Alternative 2 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION), Current Terrestrial Landscape Intactness (1km), DRECP Alternative 1 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION), Current Terrestrial Landscape Intactness (1km), DRECP Alternative 5 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION) - Development Focus Areas (DFAs), DRECP Alternative 6 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION) - Development Focus Areas (DFAs), DRECP Alternative 4 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION) - Development Focus Areas (DFAs), DRECP Alternative 3 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION) - Development Focus Areas (DFAs), DRECP Alternative 2 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION) - Development Focus Areas (DFAs), DRECP Alternative 1 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION) - Development Focus Areas (DFAs), DRECP Alternative 7 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION) - No Action Alternative/Areas Available for Development, DRECP Alternative 3 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION), Current Terrestrial Landscape Intactness (1km), DRECP Alternative 4 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION), Current Terrestrial Landscape Intactness (1km), DRECP Alternative 2 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION), Current Terrestrial Landscape Intactness (1km), DRECP Alternative 5 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION), Current Terrestrial Landscape Intactness (1km), DRECP Alternative 1 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION), Current Terrestrial Landscape Intactness (1km), DRECP Alternative 6 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION), Current Terrestrial Landscape Intactness (1km), DRECP Alternative 7 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION), Current Terrestrial Landscape Intactness (1km), DRECP Alternative 5 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION) - Development Focus Areas (DFAs), DRECP Alternative 6 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION) - Development Focus Areas (DFAs), DRECP Alternative 4 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION) - Development Focus Areas (DFAs), DRECP Alternative 3 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION) - Development Focus Areas (DFAs), DRECP Alternative 2 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION) - Development Focus Areas (DFAs), DRECP Alternative 1 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION) - Development Focus Areas (DFAs), DRECP Alternative 7 (DECEMBER 2012 VERSION) - No Action Alternative/Areas Available for Development, DRECP