Skip to main content
Advanced Search

Filters: Tags: Condition (X)

438 results (12ms)   

View Results as: JSON ATOM CSV
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
This layer represents the scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for SNK 2010 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales.
thumbnail
This layer represents the scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for SNK 2010 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales.
thumbnail
This layer represents the scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for SNK 2010 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales.
thumbnail
This layer represents the scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for SNK 2010 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales.
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near-future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near-future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near-future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...
thumbnail
This map contains:Aquatic Intactness results for the State of Utah and the Colorado Plateau Ecoregion, HUC6/12-Digit HUC resolution.Aquatic Species Intactness results clipped to 22 different species' distributions, showing the AI status/condition for each of these species of interest in Utah and the COP. An experimental Aquatic Intactness model for the Escalante subregion, which tests a methodology to incorporate detailed/specialized datasets available for only a portion of the study site into the model without penalizing no-data areas in the final intactness score. The Escalante experimental model utilizes two additional themes: riparian vegetation conversion and grazing impact. Unfortunately Grand Staircase National...
thumbnail
This map contains:Aquatic Intactness results for the State of Utah and the Colorado Plateau Ecoregion, HUC6/12-Digit HUC resolution.Aquatic Species Intactness results clipped to 22 different species' distributions, showing the AI status/condition for each of these species of interest in Utah and the COP. An experimental Aquatic Intactness model for the Escalante subregion, which tests a methodology to incorporate detailed/specialized datasets available for only a portion of the study site into the model without penalizing no-data areas in the final intactness score. The Escalante experimental model utilizes two additional themes: riparian vegetation conversion and grazing impact. Unfortunately Grand Staircase National...
thumbnail
This map contains:Aquatic Intactness results for the State of Utah and the Colorado Plateau Ecoregion, HUC6/12-Digit HUC resolution.Aquatic Species Intactness results clipped to 22 different species' distributions, showing the AI status/condition for each of these species of interest in Utah and the COP. An experimental Aquatic Intactness model for the Escalante subregion, which tests a methodology to incorporate detailed/specialized datasets available for only a portion of the study site into the model without penalizing no-data areas in the final intactness score. The Escalante experimental model utilizes two additional themes: riparian vegetation conversion and grazing impact. Unfortunately Grand Staircase National...
thumbnail
This layer represents the near-future scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for projected 2025 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales. Please see "cmbrCE and indicators.xlsx" for a complete list of which measures were applied to individual CEs for current...
thumbnail
This layer represents the near-future scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for projected 2025 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales. Please see "cmbrCE and indicators.xlsx" for a complete list of which measures were applied to individual CEs for current...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and Invasive Annual Plant Species. The annual grass index represents a summary score for a CE based upon the amount of the CE itersecting the annual grass model. The summary score is a weighted mean using the following formula. ((C0*0.5+C1*0.05+C2*0.05+C3+0.1+C4*0.1+C5*0.15)/Total Count)/0.5 *where C is the cell count by category. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation...
thumbnail
This layer represents the near-future scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for projected 2025 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales. Please see "cmbrCE and indicators.xlsx" for a complete list of which measures were applied to individual CEs for current...
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at...
thumbnail
This layer represents the scorecard of one indicator of ecosytem integrity. This ecosystem assessment is for SNK 2010 landscape condtion (LCM). NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological integrity at broader scales.
thumbnail
Scorecard analysis for terrestrial conservation elements and near-future landscape condition. The landscape condition score represents area weighted mean value based upon the combined count and condition score. sum(count*score) / sum(count) *where count equals the cell count and score is the condition value. NatureServe’s ecological integrity framework provides a practical approach to organize criteria and indicators for this purpose (Faber-Langendoen et al. 2006, Unnasch et al. 2008). This framework provides a scorecard for reporting on the ecological status of a given CE within a given location, and if needed, facilitates the aggregation and synthesis of the component results for broader measures of ecological...


map background search result map search result map BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Desert Tortoise (Sonoran Population) BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Carbonate (Limestone/Dolomite) alpine BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Near-Term: Great Basin Xeric Mixed Sagebrush Shrubland BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Brewer's Sparrow (migratory) BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Near-Term: North American Warm Desert Pavement BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Invasive Annual Plant Species - Gypsum Soils BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Near-Term: Sonora-Mojave Semi-Desert Chaparral BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Mule Deer (Year-Round) BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Gila Monster BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 714068 Cackling Goose BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 9901 Arctic Mesic Tundra BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 9358 Arctic Dwarf Shrub-Sphagnum Peatland BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 9376 Boreal Black Spruce Dwarf Tree Peatland BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 5328 Arctic Mesic Alder BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Carbonate (Limestone/Dolomite) alpine BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition - Columbian Sharp-tailed Grouse BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition - Clay Soils BLM REA COP 2014 UCS UTAH Aquatic Intactness  553395 Virgin River Chub BLM REA COP 2014 UCS UTAH Aquatic Intactness  913987 Northern Leatherside Chub BLM REA COP 2014 UCS UTAH COP Aquatic Intactness BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Desert Tortoise (Sonoran Population) BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Gila Monster BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Brewer's Sparrow (migratory) BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Invasive Annual Plant Species - Gypsum Soils BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition - Columbian Sharp-tailed Grouse BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Near-Term: Sonora-Mojave Semi-Desert Chaparral BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Near-Term: Great Basin Xeric Mixed Sagebrush Shrubland BLM REA MBR 2010 Status Assessment Near-Term: North American Warm Desert Pavement BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 9376 Boreal Black Spruce Dwarf Tree Peatland BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Carbonate (Limestone/Dolomite) alpine BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Carbonate (Limestone/Dolomite) alpine BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 9358 Arctic Dwarf Shrub-Sphagnum Peatland BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 714068 Cackling Goose BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 9901 Arctic Mesic Tundra BLM REA SNK 2010 Terrestrial Ecological Status Assessment - 5328 Arctic Mesic Alder BLM REA CBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition - Clay Soils BLM REA MBR 2010 Ecological Status Assessment: Landscape Condition Near-Term - Mule Deer (Year-Round) BLM REA COP 2014 UCS UTAH Aquatic Intactness  553395 Virgin River Chub BLM REA COP 2014 UCS UTAH Aquatic Intactness  913987 Northern Leatherside Chub BLM REA COP 2014 UCS UTAH COP Aquatic Intactness