Common loon winter dive data

Dates

Publication Date: 2020-05-29
Start Date: 2010-10-01
End Date: 2013-01-30

Citation

Kenow, K.P, Fara, L.J., Houdek, S.C., and Gray, B.R, 2021, Common loon migration and winter data: telemetry locations and archival geolocator tag location (ver 2.0, October 2022): U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9UIDEMO.

Summary

Breeding common loons for the movement and foraging pattern study were obtained from lakes in central and northern Minnesota and Wisconsin, and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Both adults of a territorial pair were fitted with archival geolocator tags (Model LAT 2500; 34.6 x 8.3 mm, 4.4 g; Lotek Wireless Inc.). A combination of adhesive and plastic cable ties were used to affix the geolocator tag to a modified lock-on aluminum leg band. Tags were programmed to collect daily location estimates for up to two years, tag temperature (0.02o C accuracy, ≤ 0.05o C resolution) at 30-min intervals, and pressure data (±1% accuracy, 0.05% resolution) at 20-sec intervals during daylight hours to document foraging patterns (dive profiles) while [...]

Summary

Breeding common loons for the movement and foraging pattern study were obtained from lakes in central and northern Minnesota and Wisconsin, and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Both adults of a territorial pair were fitted with archival geolocator tags (Model LAT 2500; 34.6 x 8.3 mm, 4.4 g; Lotek Wireless Inc.). A combination of adhesive and plastic cable ties were used to affix the geolocator tag to a modified lock-on aluminum leg band. Tags were programmed to collect daily location estimates for up to two years, tag temperature (0.02o C accuracy, ≤ 0.05o C resolution) at 30-min intervals, and pressure data (±1% accuracy, 0.05% resolution) at 20-sec intervals during daylight hours to document foraging patterns (dive profiles) while on the Great Lakes during fall migration and on the wintering grounds. Data stored on geolocator tags were not transmitted, requiring that the marked loon be recaptured to recover the tag and download the data. The geolocator tags were capable of storing data for several years before the devices needed to be downloaded. Geolocator tag data collected over the previous year(s) were downloaded from tags using LAT Viewer Studio software (Lotek Wireless Inc.). Geolocator tag location estimates were based on light-based geolocations using the template-fitting approach (Exstrom, 2004), in combination with tag temperature (sea surface temperature) and pressure (dive depth) data. Template-fit error estimates were used to filter aberrant geolocation estimates. Sea surface temperature (derived from NASA Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer [MODIS] imagery) across North America inland lakes, Atlantic coastal waters, and the Gulf of Mexico, coupled with diving depth information were used to improve or obtain location estimates and timing of migration movements when light-based geolocation estimates were unreliable. Attributes of dives (i.e., proportion of time underwater, depth of dive, ascent and descent rates, duration of dive, time within 2 m of maximum depth, post dive surface interval) were extracted from pressure data. When geotagged loons were in freshwater, depth was estimated by pressure (dbar) * 1.019716 m / dbar (http://www.seabird.com/document/an69-conversion-pressure-depth). When geotagged loons occurred in marine environments, depth was estimated from pressure measurements, estimates of gravity at given latitude and depth, all at standard ocean mass salinity of 35 g/kg (Fofonoff and Millard 1983). Dives were considered as submergence below the water surface, which we define as recorded depth of >0.8 m (typical body length of adult common loons in this study). Because pressure data were collected at 20-sec intervals, we interpolated the times of both dive initiation and surfacing. Maximum daily ascent and descent rates were estimated individually for each loon and used to interpolate these times, where rates were based on median values derived from dives >35 m (n = 3,974 dives of 10 individual loons). The descent and ascent rates used for interpolation were 1.056 m/sec and 1.605 m/sec, respectively, when loons were in freshwater (Kenow et al. 2018), and 0.992 and 1.399 m/sec, respectively, in marine environments.

Contacts

Point of Contact :: Kevin P Kenow
Originator :: Kevin P Kenow, Luke J Fara, Steven C Houdek, Brian R Gray
Metadata Contact :: Kevin P Kenow, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center
Publisher :: U.S. Geological Survey
SDC Data Owner :: Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center
USGS Mission Area :: Ecosystems
Distributor :: U.S. Geological Survey - ScienceBase

Attached Files

sorting

Metadata First

Recent First

Alphabetical

Click on title to download individual files attached to this item.

Common loon winter dive data Final.xml Original FGDC Metadata	View	23.23 KB	application/fgdc+xml
analyze winter loon dive depth distribute.sas		3.66 KB	application/x-sas
analyze winter loon dive duration distribute.sas		5.98 KB	application/x-sas
analyze winter loon post dive surface interval distribute.sas		7.96 KB	application/x-sas
analyze winter loon time max depth distribute.sas		7.14 KB	application/x-sas
COLO winter dive data.csv		14.75 MB	text/csv
Gray Kenow 2020 winter loon dive readme.md_21dec20.rtf		46.31 KB	application/rtf

Purpose

Data were collected to determine the foraging patterns of common loons while on wintering areas.

Dates

Citation

Summary

Summary

Contacts

Attached Files

sorting

Metadata First

Recent First

Alphabetical

Purpose

Map

Communities

Tags

Provenance

Item Actions

View Item as ...

Save Item as ...

View Item...

Dates

Citation

Summary

Summary

Contacts

Attached Files sorting Metadata First Recent First Alphabetical

Purpose

Map

Communities

Tags

Provenance

Item Actions

View Item as ...

Save Item as ...

View Item...

Attached Files

sorting

Metadata First

Recent First

Alphabetical